Friday, February 24, 2012

NY Times - "Should Corporations Have More Leeway to Kill Than People Do?"

Bringing sHell to a 3rd World Near You
    Peter Weiss, a retired lawyer, and a current vice president of the Center for Constitutional Rights wrote an enlightening albeit somewhat dry article for the NY Times Opinions section on Politics, in which he enlightens the reader to consider the following: "Should Corporations Have More Leeway to Kill Than People Do". Though he formed his argument as a question, he does so to invoke the readers own morals and emotions. I feel as though this was a great tactic to subconsciously invest the reader while they consider his opinions. Mr. Weiss does spend much of the article just enumerating facts, making this article a little dry and difficult to read, he does so, however, in order to formulate his argument on solid ground. Towards the end of the article Mr. Weiss finally states his opinion as such:
    A decision affirming that Shell should go unpunished in the Niger Delta case would leave us with a Supreme Court that seems of two minds: in the words of Justice John Paul Steven’s dissent from Citizens United, it threatens “to undermine the integrity of elected institutions across the nation” by treating corporations as people to let them make unlimited political contributions, even as it treats corporations as if they are not people to immunize them from prosecution for the most grievous human rights violations."  
Stating that the potential effects of such a ruling could lead to "multinational corporations (particularly in mining and other extractive industries) [drawing] the lesson that it is now safer to forge alliances with autocratic regimes that have poor human rights records because they will not be judged culpable in the way individuals can be." 
    Although I whole-heartedly agree with Mr. Weiss' ultimate, yet slightly vague assumption that it is not fair, practical or legal (both by natural and constitutional law) to allow an entity to hold all the positive benefits of citizenship without little to any of the responsibilities of citizenship, I feel as though his argument was mild and unemotional considering the nature of this dilemma. If Shell is not held accountable for something as heinous and despicable as these war-crimes, the final result is the last nail in the coffin of human freedoms and rights, as a supreme new class is introduced into the U.S./World economy and politics, answerable to no one and wealthier than any individual citizen. Considering the stakes, one would like to see the passion.

Original Article:

Additional Information (linked due to embedding being forbidden):

Friday, February 10, 2012

Obama vs the Pope - Ding! Round 2


Maybe we should have drawn that line in cement?

There has been a lot of buzz lately over President Obama's stand on birth control when it comes to Church supplied health insurance plans for church employees (as can be seen here @ MSNBC.com). Since the inception of the U.S., separation of church and state has played a defining and pivotal role in our evolution, and as such can be a very touchy subject to maneuver. As a preacher's son and an avid believer in human/religious freedoms while still being somewhat the conservationist, this is a very delicate subject for me. On the one hand, I believe firmly that no church should be forced by government mandate to offend their own beliefs, yet on the other, in a day and age where we are on the fast track to 7 billion people on this planet with a current starving population estimated at 14% and growing (according to Wikipedia), we absolutely must do something to curb our population growth. Obama's decision to revamp his former mandate, editing in that the insurance companies must provide this coverage free of charge (found here), is quite possibly the James T. Kirk to this Kobayashi Maru, then again, it could be just another wet band-aid. The question now is, will it hold, and will this lead to further erosion of our freedoms as citizens and human beings.

Original Article:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46341851

Additional Information: